Skip to content
Trusted Works Daily

Tetris Couldn't Triumph at This Gaming Ceremony — An Additional Classification Might Solve This

Whenever a prominent awards ceremony approaches, one notices an outcry for introducing of new categories to honor unsung work and fill the hearts of enthusiasts dedicated to specific genres.

Another commentator made the case for a horror game category. It would be amazing. Equally deserving are strategy board titles, representing a passionate advocate's mission. Yet I need to apologize in advance for pushing forward just as with other blinkered fanatics, I possess a compelling case supporting my request stands as crucial and significant. This is the request: It's essential to create a category for puzzle games.

The Genre Classification Challenge

Classifying creative works defies precise measurement; it’s very subjective, and it will always spark debates resulting in unclear classifications. There’s a reason cinema institutions steer clear of genre categories. However, it represents a necessary evil for the industry of interactive entertainment, that demonstrate such variety it's challenging to consider them as a single art form.

To recognize the complete range of interactive entertainment excellence to be recognized, while allowing diverse titles to receive proper recognition, classification by type becomes crucial.

Existing Game Classification System

Leading game ceremonies offer these award types recognizing Action-oriented games, Adventure-action titles, RPG experiences, Fighting, Simulation and strategy titles, plus athletic and racing experiences. Between them, these six categories effectively encompass many game types, making space possible for numerous titles.

This doesn't apply to logic-based experiences. No suitable classification appears to put them. Consider three of outstanding current releases, all very different: the architectural riddles of one title, intense tile-matching from another release, thought-provoking social scenarios in another game. What category would fit them between these six categories? Nowhere, that’s where.

Acknowledgment Issues

Numerous examples exist excellent brain-teasers released every year lacking appropriate categories at major award shows, if they accidentally match award groups including Mobile Game, Virtual reality experiences, and the highly challenging independent game categories.

  • A renowned logic title received no recognition in any category that year
  • Another creative title was excluded during that ceremony
  • Well-received sorting experience got ignored recently
  • Only a few brain-teasers scraped into niche award types

Value of Brain-Teasers

Commonly they're modest productions, yet the craft of the puzzle game carries substantial weight. Well-known matching games stand as most popular titles globally continuing this trend for many years.

The iconic tile-matching title rivals famous sandbox experiences claiming status as best-selling game of all time; it’s also in the running for best game of all time. Puzzle games are foundational for gaming as medium, while interacting with diverse game types.

Recommendation and Reasoning

Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter such difficulty. It would be easy to populate five nominees interesting, varied, worthy titles each ceremony simply — actually, with challenge, because you’d have to leave numerous deserving experiences.

To emphasize again, these represent titles without proper classification at major gaming awards. Puzzle game makers operate at the demanding boundary of video game design, creating some of most fundamental forms of the video game form. Comparable to cinema stunt performers, they warrant appreciation. Don't make them wait decades.

The writer

Emily Clark

Lena Visser is a senior journalist with over a decade of experience covering international affairs and digital trends.

Trusted Works Daily

Type to search articles.